This Article Résumé Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Potvin, L. Articles by Gendron, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Potvin, L. Articles by Gendron, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Trois défis pour l'évaluation en promotion de la santé

Département de Médecine sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Chaire (FCRSS-IRSC) Approche communautaire et inégalités de santé, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Centre de recherche Léa-Roback sur les inégalités sociales de santé, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Louise.Potvin{at}UMontreal.Ca

Angèle Bilodeau, PhD

Chaire (FCRSS-IRSC) Approche communautaire et inégalités de santé, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Centre de recherche Léa-Roback sur les inégalités sociales de santé, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Direction de la santé publique de Montréal, Montréal

Sylvie Gendron, PhD

Chaire (FCRSS-IRSC) Approche communautaire et inégalités de santé, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Centre de recherche Léa-Roback sur les inégalités sociales de santé, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Faculté des Sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal

Key Words: Mots clés : évaluation • promotion de la santé • méthodologie

References

• Potvin L., Goldberg C. Deux rôles joués par l'évaluation dans la transformation de la pratique en promotion de la santé. Dans: O'Neill M, Dupéré S, Pederson A, Rootman I, editors. Promotion de la santé au Canada et au Québec, perspectives critiques. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval; 2006. p. 457-74.
• Mark M., Henry GT, Julnes G. Evaluation. An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving public and non profit policies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2000.
• Potvin L., Gendron S., Bilodeau A. Três posturas ontológicas concernentes à natureza dos programas de saúde: implicações para a avaliação. In: Bosi, Mlm & Mercado, FJ editors. Avaliaçao qualitative de programas de saude. enfoques emergentes. Petropolis (Brazil): Vozes Editorial; 2006. p. 65-86.
• Potvin L., Gendron S., Bilodeau A., Chabot P. Integrating social science theory into public health practice. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 591-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Levesque L., Richard L., Duplantie J., Gauvin L., Cargo M., Renaud L., Potvin L. Vers une description et une évaluation du caractère écologique des interventions en promotion de la santé: le cas du programme de la Carélie du nord. Rupture, revue transdisciplinaire en santé 2000; 7: 114-29.
• Dab W. Réflexions sur les défis de la programmation en santé. Promotion & Education 2005; (Suppl 3): 74-7.
• Potvin L., Haddad S., Frohlich KL Beyond process and outcome evaluation: a comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes. Dans: Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, Ziglio, E, editors. Evaluation in health promotion. Principles and perspectives. European series; No 92. Copenhague: WHO regional publications; 2001. p. 45-62.
• LeMoigne J-M. La théorie du système général. théorie de la modélisation. Paris: Presse universitaires de France; 1977.
• Rootman I., Goodstadt M., Potvin L., Springett J. A framework for health promotion evaluation. In: Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, Ziglio E, editors. Evaluation in health promotion. principles and perspectives. European series; No 92. Copenhague: WHO regional publications; 2001. p. 7-38.
• Dooris M., Poland B., Kolbe L., De Leuuw E., McCall D., Wharf-Higgins J. Healthy settings. Building evidence for the effectiveness of whole system health promotion - challenges and future directions. Dans: McQueen, DV, Jones, CM, editors. Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 327-52.
• Potvin L. Managing uncertainty through participation. Dans: McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, Pelikan J, Balbo L, Abel T, editors. Health & modernity. The role of theory in health promotion. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 103-28.
• Thurston WE, Potvin L. Evaluability assessment: a tool for incorporating evaluation in social change programs. Evaluation 2003; 9: 453-69.[Abstract]
• Bisset SL, Potvin L. Expanding our conceptualization of program implementation: lessons from the genealogy of a school-based nutrition program. Health Educ Res 2007; 22: 737-46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Crozier M., Friedberg E. L'acteur et le système. Paris: Seuil; 1977.
• Brown P. The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community initiatives. Dans: Connell JP, Kubisch AC, Schorr LB, Weiss CH, editors. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Concepts, methods and contexts. New York: Aspen Institute; 1995. p. 201-25.
• McQueen DV, Anderson L. What counts as evidence: issues and debates. Dans: Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, Ziglio E, editors. Evaluation in health promotion. principles and perspectives. European series; No 92. Copenhague: WHO regional publications; 2001. p. 63-81.
• Campbell DT Can we be scientific in applied social science? Evaluation Studies Review Annual 1984; 9: 26-48.
• Kickbusch I. The contribution of the World Health Organisation to a new public. Health and health promotion. Am J Public health 2003; 93: 383-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Potvin L., McQueen DV Modernity, public health and health promotion. A reflexive discourse. Dans: McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, Pelikan J, Balbo L, Abel T, editors. Health & modernity. The role of theory in health promotion. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 12-20.
• Rothman KL Modern epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1986.
• Baskhar R. A realist theory of science. Londres: Haverster Wheatsheaf; 1978.
• Rubin DB Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non randomized studies. Journal of Education Psychology 1974; 66: 688-701.[CrossRef]
• Hawe P., Shiell A., Riley T. Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomized control trial be? BMJ 2004; 328: 1561-3.[Free Full Text]
• Hill AB Observation and experiment. New Engl J Med 1953; 248: 995-1001.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pawson R., Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London (UK): Sage; 1997.
• Yin RK Case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
• Huberman M., Miles M. Analyse des données qualitatives. Bruxelles: De Boeck; 1991.
• Stake, R. Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.
• Barnes M., Matka E., Sullivan H. Evidence, understanding and complexity. Evaluation in nonlinear systems. Evaluation 2003; 9: 265-84.[Abstract]
• McQueen DV, Jones CM, editors. Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer; 2007.
• Zaza S., Briss PA, Harris KW The guide to community preventive services. What works to promote health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
• McQueen DV Evidence and theory. Continuing debates on evidence and effectiveness. Dans: McQueen DV, Jones CM, editors. Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 281-303.
• Potvin L., Mantoura P., Ridde V. Evaluating equity in health promotion. Dans: McQueen DV, Jones & Cm, editors. Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 367-83.
• Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. La charte d'Ottawa pour la promotion de la santé. Ottawa: Organisation mondiale de la santé, Santé et Bien-être social Canada et Association canadienne de santé publique; 1986.
• Boutiller M., Mason R. Le praticien réflexif en promotion de la santé: de la réflexion à la réflexivité. Dans: O'Neill M, Dupéré S, Pederson A, Rootman I, editors. Promotion de la santé au Canada et au Québec, perspectives critiques. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval; 2006. p. 399-420.
• Callon M., Rabeharisoa V. Research in the wild and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society 2003; 25: 193-204.[CrossRef]
• Bilodeau A., Allard D., Gendron S., Potvin L. Les dispositifs de la participation aux étapes stratégiques de l'évaluation. Revue canadienne d'évaluation de programmes 2006;21 (Numéro spécial):257-82.

Promotion & Education, Vol. 15, No. 1 suppl, 17-21 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1025382308093991


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A Koelen, L. Vaandrager, and A. Wagemakers What is needed for coordinated action for health? Fam. Pract., October 20, 2008; (2008) cmn073v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Résumé Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Potvin, L. Articles by Gendron, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Potvin, L. Articles by Gendron, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?