|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Revitalising the evidence base for public health: an assets model
Antony Morgan
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, antonyhmfph{at}tiscali.co.uk
Erio Ziglio
WHO European Office for Investment for Health and Development, Venice, Italy
Historically, approaches to the promotion of population health have been based on a deficit model. That is, they tend to focus on identifying the problems and needs of populations that require professional resources and high levels of dependence on hospital and welfare services. These deficit models are important and necessary to identify levels of needs and priorities. But they need to be complemented by some other perspectives as they have some drawbacks. Deficit models tend to define communities and individuals in negative terms, disregarding what is positive and works well in particular populations. In contrast `assets' models tend to accentuate positive capability to identify problems and activate solutions. They focus on promoting salutogenic resources that promote the self esteem and coping abilities of individuals and communities, eventually leading to less dependency on professional services.
Much of the evidence available to policy makers to inform decisions about the most effective approaches to promoting health and to tackling health inequities is based on a deficit model and this may disproportionately lead to policies and practices which disempower the populations and communities who are supposed to benefit from them. An assets approach to health and development embraces a `salutogenic' notion of health creation and in doing so encourages the full participation of local communities in the health development process.
The asset model presented here aims to revitalise how policy makers, researchers and practitioners think and act to promote a more resourceful approach to tackling health inequities. The model outlines a systematic approach to asset based public health which can provide scientific evidence and best practice on how to maximise the stock of key assets necessary for promoting health. Redressing the balance between the assets and deficit models for evidence based public health could help us to unlock some of the existing barriers to effective action on health inequities. This re-balancing would help in better understanding the factors that influence health and what can be done about them. It would promote a positive and inclusive approach to action. (Promotion & Education, 2007, Supplement (2): pp 17-22).
Key Words: health assets • salutogenesis • asset mapping • evaluation
References
- Acheson, D. (1998) Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report. The Stationery Office, London.
- Antonovsky, A. (1987) Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
- Anotonovsky, A. (1996) The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International vol. 11, pp. 11-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bartley, M. (2006) Ed. Capability and resilience: beating the odds. University College London, London. UCL. <www.ucl.ac.uk/capabilityandresilience>
- Bauer, G., Davies, J.K. & Pelakin, J. (2006). The EUHPID health development model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promotion International vol 21, no 2, pp. 153-159.
- Exworthy, M., Blane, D. & Marmot, M. (2003). Tackling health inequalities in the United Kingdom: the progress and pitfalls of policy. Health Services Research vol 38, pp. 1905-1921.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Exworthy, M., Berney, L. & Powell, M. (2002) How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally': the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities Policy and Politics vol 30, no,1 pp. 79-96.[CrossRef]
- Department of Health. (2003) Tackling health inequalities: a programme for action. Department of Health, London.
- Guy, T., Fuller, D. & Pletsch, C. (2002) Asset Mapping: A Handbook. Ottawa, Ontario, Canadian Rural Partnership. <http://www.rural.gc.ca/conference/documents/m apping_e.phtml>
- Iuhpe (2000) The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: Shaping public health in a new Europe. A report for the European Commission ECSC-EC —EXEC, Brussels. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression
- Harrison, D., Ziglio, E., Levin. L. & Morgan, A. (2004). Assets for Health and Development: developing a conceptual framework. European Office for investment for Health and Development. World Health Organisation, Venice.
- Hillls, D. (2004) Evaluation of community levels interventions for health improvement: a review of experience in the UK. Health Development Agency, London.
- Hunter, D. & Killoran, A. (2004) Tackling health inequalities: turning policy into practice. Health Development Agency, London.
- Jordan, C., Dowswell, T., Harrison, S. Lilford, R. & Mort, M. (1998) Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public. British Medical Journal vol 316 pp. 1668-1670.[Free Full Text]
- Judd, J., Frankish, J. & Moulton, G. (2001) Setting standards in the evaluation of community based health promotion programmes — a unifying approach. Health Promotion International. vol 16, no 4, pp. 367-379.
- Judge, K., Platt, S., Costongs, C. and Jurczak, K. (2006) Health Inequalities: a challenge for Europe. An independent expert report commissioned by the UK Presidency of the EU. <http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/ dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasse t/dh_4121583.pdf>
- Kretzmann. J. & Mcknight, J. (1993) Building Communities from the inside out: a path towards building and mobilising a communities assets. Institute for Policy Research, Evanston, Illinois.
- Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B.P., Lochner, K. & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997) Social Capital, Income and Inequality. American Journal of Public Health vol 87, pp. 1491-98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- King, A. (2000). The New Zealand health strategy Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
- Koelen, M., Vaadrager, L. & Colomer, C. (2001) Health promotion research: dilemmas and challenges. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 55, pp. 257-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lindstrom, B. & Eriksson, M. (2005) Salutogenesis — a glossary. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 59, pp. 440-442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lindstrom, B. & Erikksson, M. (2006) Contextualising salutogenesis and Antonovsky in public health development. Health Promotion International vol 212, No.3, pp. 238-244.
- Mackenbach, J.P. & Bakker, M.J. (2002) Reducing inequalities in health: the European perspective. Routledge, London.
- Marmot. M.G., Davey Smith, G., Stansfield, S., Patel, C., North, F., Head, J., White, I., Brunner, E. & Feeney, A. (1991) Health inequalities among British civil servants; the Whitehall II study. Lancet: 337: 1387-1393.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mcknight, J. (1995) The careless society: community and its counterfeits. Basic Books, New York.
- Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (2003 ) National Public Health Strategy for Sweden, Swedish National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm <www.fhi.se/upload/PDF/2004/english/strategy.pdf>
- Morgan, A. & Ziglio, E. (2006) Foreword. In: Capability and resilience: beating the odds. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London.
- Morgan, A. & Popay, J. (2007). Community participation for health. Reducing health inequalities and building social capital? In Scriven, A. & Garman, S. Public Health: social context and action. Open University Press, London
- Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. Sage, London.
- Putnam, R. (1995). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton. University Press. New Jersey.
- Savedoff, W., Levine, R. & Birdsall, N. (2006) When will we ever, learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation. Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group. Centre for Global Development, Washington.
- Stahl, T., Wismar, W., Ollila, E., Lahtinen, E. & Leppo, K. (Eds) (2006) Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki, Finland. <http://info.stakes.fi/NR/rdonlyres/76F97493-0284-4E47-A744-5CAE91A546C7/0/HIAPKirja.pdf >
- Whitehead, M., Petticrew, M., Graham, H., Macintyre, S., Bambra, C. & Egan, M. Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: Assembling the evidence jigsaw. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 58 pp. 817-21.
- Whitehead, M. & Dahlgren, G. (2006) Levelling up (part 1): a discussion paper on concepts and principles for tackling social inequalities in health. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen.
- Wilkinson, R.G. (1996) Unhealthy Societies: the afflictions of inequality. Routledge, London. London Routledge.
- Wimbush, E. & Watson, J. (2000) An evaluation framework for health promotion: theory, quality and effectiveness. Evaluation vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 301-321.
- Woodward, A. & Kawachi, I. (2000). Why reduce health inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 54 pp. 923-929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- World Health Organisation (1986) Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen.
- World Health Organisation (2003). Millennium Development Goals. WHO's contribution to tracing progress and measuring achievements. World Health Organisation, Geneva.
- World Health Organisation (2005) Towards a conceptual framework for analysis and action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organisation, Geneva
- Ziglio, E., Hagard. S. & Griffiths, J. (2000) Health promotion development in Europe: acheivments and challenges. Health Promotion International vol 15, no. 2, pp. 143-153.
Promotion & Education, Vol. 14, No. 2 suppl,
17-22 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/10253823070140020701x
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
R. Ebina and Y. Yamazaki
Sense of coherence and coping in adolescents directly affected by the 1991--5 war in Croatia
Global Health Promotion,
December 1, 2008;
15(4):
5 - 10.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
