Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Promotion & Education
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobato Tavares, M. d. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mendes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobato Tavares, M. d. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mendes, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Theory and practice in the context of health promotion program evaluation

Maria da Fátima Lobato Tavares

Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil, flobato{at}ensp.fiocruz.br

Cláudia Márcia Santos Barros

Social Commerce Service (SESC) - National Department, Brasil

Willer Baumgarten Marcondes

Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

Regina Bodstein

Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

Simone Cynamon Cohen

Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

Debora Cynamon Kligerman

Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

Francisco Comarú

Faculty of Public Health, São Paolo University, Brazil

Carlos Santos Silva

Municipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Cláudia Maria Bógus

Faculty of Public Health, São Paolo University, Brazil

Rosa Maria da Rocha

Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

Alexandre Moraes de Mello

School of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Leila Adesse

Researcher, Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil

Katia Edmundo

Center for Health Promotion (CEDAPS), Brazil

Rosilda Mendes

CEPEDOC Healthy Municipalities, Faculty of Public Health, São Paolo University, Brazil

Evaluation of health promotion (HP) actions is a major challenge, generating inquiries and reflections that can contribute on the effectiveness of the actions themselves. With the aim on fostering exchange on monitoring and evaluation experiences related to the implementation of healthy settings, the 1st Brazilian Seminar on Health Promotion Effectiveness was launched in 2005. The program included round table and workshops known as Working Groups (WG) in Brazil. The criteria used to constitute the workshops focused settings as spaces of circulation and living as an intrinsic connection to lifestyles and conditions, as well as to social and/or environmental risk factors associated with groups living in these settings day after day.

Focusing on evaluation as an activity that generates knowledge, this article highlights and stimulates the discussion about some major issues arising from the theoretical-methodological approach and the discussions developed in the workshops. The debates carried out during the Seminar illustrated the different perceptions and views of the social players involved in implementation and evaluation of HP practices, disclosing a multiplicity of meanings. It became clear that procedures are needed to document a future maturation of concepts and methods, in combination with further in-depth theoretical discussion. (Promotion & Education, 2007, Supplement (1): pp 27-30)

Key Words: effectiveness • evaluation • health promotion • monitoring

References

  • Akerman, M. et al. (2002). Avaliação em promoção da saúde: foco no município saudável. Revista de Saúde Pública 36(5):638-646.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Augusto, L.G.S. (2005). O pragmatismo e o utilitarismo não resolveram, e agora? In: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 10(4):808-809.
  • Breucker, G. e Schöer, A. (1999). Promoción de la salud eficaz en el lugar de trabajo. In: La Evidencia de la Eficacia de la Promoción de la Salud. Madrid, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo.
  • Cohen, S.C. (2004). Habitação Saudável como um Caminho para a Promoção da Saúde. Tese de Doutorado defendida na Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. ENSP, Rio de Janeiro.
  • Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogia da autonomia — saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo, Paz e Terra.
  • Ibge (2004). Pesquisa Mensal de Emprego, janeiro a dezembro 2004.
  • Luz, M.T. (2004). Fragilidade Social e Busca de Cuidado na Sociedade Civil de Hoje. In: Pinheiro, R. e Mattos, R. A. de (Org.) — Cuidado — as Fronteiras da Integralidade. Rio de Janeiro: Hucitec: ABRASCO.
  • Opas/ Oms. (1996). Escuelas Promotoras de Salud. Modelo y Guia para la Acción. Washington DC.
  • Opas/ Oms (1999). Guia de Avaliação Participativa em Municípios e Comunidades Saudáveis no Brasil.
  • Pastore, J.( 2005). Perspectivas e Problemas do Emprego no Brasil. Disponível em http://www.cebri.org.br/pdf/232_pdf.pdf. Acessado em 13/03/2006.
  • Pedrosa, J.I.S. (2004). Perspectivas na avaliação em promoção da saúde: uma abordagem institucional. In: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 9(3):617-626.
  • Sanchez, J.E. (1997). Metropolização e modernidade. In: Santos, M. et al. (Org.). O novo mapa do mundo: fim de século e globalização. São Paulo: Hucitec/ANPUR, p. 293-302.
  • WHO (1998). Health Promotion Evaluation: recommendations to policymakers. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
  • WHO (2001). Evaluation in Health Promotion principles and perspectives. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.

Promotion & Education, Vol. 14, No. 1 suppl, 27-30 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/10253823070140010601x


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobato Tavares, M. d. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mendes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobato Tavares, M. d. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mendes, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?