This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Puig-Ribera, A. Articles by Brown, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Puig-Ribera, A. Articles by Brown, W. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Change in work day step counts, wellbeing and job performance in Catalan university employees: a randomised controlled trial

Universitat de Vic, Catalonia, Spain, annam.puig{at}uvic.cat

Jim McKenna

Carnegie Research Institute, Faculty of Sport and Education, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK

Nicholas Gilson

School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Wendy J. Brown

School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Using a randomised controlled trial design, this feasibility study assessed the impact of two walking interventions on quality of life (QoL) and job performance of Catalan university employees.

A convenience sample of 70 employees completed baseline and intervention measures of step counts (Yamax SW 200 pedometer), wellbeing (SF-12 questionnaire) and work performance (Work Limitations Questionnaire) over 9 weeks. Before intervention, baseline step counts (five working days) were used to randomly allocate participants to a control (n = 26), "walking routes" (n = 19) and "walking while working" (n = 25) groups. Intervention effects were evaluated by calculating differences between pre-intervention and intervention data. One-way ANOVA was used to examine differences between groups.

No significant group differences were found for changes in work-day step counts, QoL or work performance. When data from the two intervention groups were pooled (n = 44) there was a significant increase in step counts (+659 steps/day; n = 12; p < 0.01) among participants classified as `Sedentary—Low active' (0—7499 steps/day) at baseline. In contrast there was a significant decrease (—637 steps/day; p < 0.05) in those initially categorised as `Active' (> 10,000 steps/day; n = 21) and no change in those categorised as `Moderately Active' (7500—9999, n = 11). The `Sedentary—Low activity' group showed consistently greater improvements in QoL and work performance scores than the Moderate and Active groups.

Initially low active participants showed the greatest increase in step counts and improved QoL and work productivity profiles. These data indicate the potential for improving QoL and job productivity through workplace walking in inactive Catalan employees.

Key Words: walking • health promotion • workplace • productivity

Promotion & Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, 11-16 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1025382308097693


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?